<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The New Enlightenment: Commentary</title>
	<atom:link href="http://enlit.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://enlit.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>The Nature and Future of Enlightenment Thinking in the 21st Century</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:31:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Sex in an Enlightened Society by John G</title>
		<link>http://enlit.wordpress.com/2008/03/15/sex-in-an-enlightened-society/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>John G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlit.wordpress.com/?p=17#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Thank you for posting this. Other than Heidi Fleiss&#039; interview in Newsweek (http://www.newsweek.com/id/121325?from=rss), I haven&#039;t heard anything quite so sensible about this incident. Nice job.

Specifically, I&#039;m for anyone opposing &quot;slavish acceptance of inherited dogmas.&quot; We should only slavishly accept *original* dogmas, I say. As Crow T. Robot once put it on Mystery Science Theater, &quot;There&#039;s no tradition like a new tradition.&quot; 

No, but seriously, there&#039;s one crime that Spitzer can&#039;t evade even with the help of a free-thinking anthro-apologist standing bravely by his side. That crime is aggressively pushing for stricter vice laws and going out of his way to speak out against prostitution, only to regularly indulge in the practice. That&#039;s the grimmest kind of hypocrisy, not at all unlike the GOP senators and church leaders who villify homosexuality while practicing it. It does great harm to a society to have our leaders stake their moral reputation fighting something they practice themselves. For crying out loud, the Spitzers of the world should pick another issue. (I don&#039;t recall Bill Clinton campaigning against infidelity; then again, I was holding my hands over my ears after about Year 2 of his reign.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for posting this. Other than Heidi Fleiss&#8217; interview in Newsweek (<a href="http://www.newsweek.com/id/121325?from=rss)" rel="nofollow">http://www.newsweek.com/id/121325?from=rss)</a>, I haven&#8217;t heard anything quite so sensible about this incident. Nice job.</p>
<p>Specifically, I&#8217;m for anyone opposing &#8220;slavish acceptance of inherited dogmas.&#8221; We should only slavishly accept *original* dogmas, I say. As Crow T. Robot once put it on Mystery Science Theater, &#8220;There&#8217;s no tradition like a new tradition.&#8221; </p>
<p>No, but seriously, there&#8217;s one crime that Spitzer can&#8217;t evade even with the help of a free-thinking anthro-apologist standing bravely by his side. That crime is aggressively pushing for stricter vice laws and going out of his way to speak out against prostitution, only to regularly indulge in the practice. That&#8217;s the grimmest kind of hypocrisy, not at all unlike the GOP senators and church leaders who villify homosexuality while practicing it. It does great harm to a society to have our leaders stake their moral reputation fighting something they practice themselves. For crying out loud, the Spitzers of the world should pick another issue. (I don&#8217;t recall Bill Clinton campaigning against infidelity; then again, I was holding my hands over my ears after about Year 2 of his reign.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Existentialism, or the Missing Ingredient? by ismsarebad</title>
		<link>http://enlit.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/existentialism-or-the-missing-ingredient/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>ismsarebad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jul 2007 01:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlit.wordpress.com/2007/07/24/existentialism-or-the-missing-ingredient/#comment-10</guid>
		<description>You stated everything in here perfectly. From what I&#039;ve read on your blog so far, I like the stuff you write. Keep it up! :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You stated everything in here perfectly. From what I&#8217;ve read on your blog so far, I like the stuff you write. Keep it up! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sincerity and Authenticity by Aicha</title>
		<link>http://enlit.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/sincerity-and-authenticity/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Aicha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Mar 2007 22:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://enlit.wordpress.com/2007/01/09/sincerity-and-authenticity/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I agree with Patterson, but up to a point: authenticity and sincerity are deeply connected, and you can&#039;t have &quot;sincere&quot; behavior without some kind of emotional authenticity behind it. A politican can be a raging homophobe and racist yet be courteous toward the gay and black community in order to advance his career, or a waitress may be sincerely flattered by the attentions of a greasy, rich patron. But the problem is that people can sense when you try to hide your deepest emotions beneath a veneer of social politeness. It&#039;s troubling for them to watch, and it&#039;s troubling for the &quot;inauthentic but sincere&quot; person to take actions that veer too far off from inner conviction. When that facade explodes - that&#039;s when we get guys like Mark Foley, that&#039;s when we get the late-life divorce of couples that secretly hated each other for 50 years. The emotional connections that Patterson dismisses *must* be there to back up those &quot;sincere&quot; actions, at least if these actions are to be sustained over time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Patterson, but up to a point: authenticity and sincerity are deeply connected, and you can&#8217;t have &#8220;sincere&#8221; behavior without some kind of emotional authenticity behind it. A politican can be a raging homophobe and racist yet be courteous toward the gay and black community in order to advance his career, or a waitress may be sincerely flattered by the attentions of a greasy, rich patron. But the problem is that people can sense when you try to hide your deepest emotions beneath a veneer of social politeness. It&#8217;s troubling for them to watch, and it&#8217;s troubling for the &#8220;inauthentic but sincere&#8221; person to take actions that veer too far off from inner conviction. When that facade explodes &#8211; that&#8217;s when we get guys like Mark Foley, that&#8217;s when we get the late-life divorce of couples that secretly hated each other for 50 years. The emotional connections that Patterson dismisses *must* be there to back up those &#8220;sincere&#8221; actions, at least if these actions are to be sustained over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
